Ingredient Science and Applications explores multifunctional ingredients used in cosmetics, food, and personal care. This category examines ingredient chemistry, safety, stability, and regulatory frameworks. It also covers formulation science behind widely used compounds such as citric acid and other organic acids.

Citric Acid in Cosmetics: pH Control, Buffer Design, and Safety

citric acid buffer system controlling pH in cosmetic formulation

Citric acid appears in thousands of cosmetic formulations. Most ingredient glossaries describe it simply as a pH adjuster or mild alpha hydroxy acid (AHA). However, this simplified explanation ignores the chemistry that determines its safety, irritation potential, buffering behavior, and interaction with preservation systems. In practice, citric acid does far more than “lower pH.” It influences preservative efficacy, metal chelation, antioxidant stability, and irritation risk. Therefore, formulators must understand its biological and chemical boundaries rather than treating it as a neutral background ingredient.

This article examines citric acid through a formulation lens: safe concentration ranges, pH–irritation relationships, buffering mechanics, chelation strength, preservation support, and regulatory positioning.

What citric acid actually does in cosmetic systems

Citric acid is a tricarboxylic acid naturally present in citrus fruits and widely produced via fermentation for industrial use. In cosmetic systems, it serves four primary functions:

  • pH adjustment
  • Buffer system component (citric acid + citrate salts)
  • Mild exfoliating AHA at low pH
  • Weak chelating agent for trace metals

While many formulas use it only to adjust final pH, its buffering and chelating roles often determine long-term stability. Consequently, ignoring these roles increases the risk of pH drift, oxidation, and preservative instability.

Safe use levels: what the CIR actually reports

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel evaluated citric acid and its salts and concluded that they are safe in cosmetics when formulated to be non-irritating. According to the CIR report, leave-on products have reported concentrations up to approximately 4%, while rinse-off products may use higher concentrations due to reduced exposure duration.

Importantly, the CIR emphasizes that irritation depends not only on concentration but also on final formulation pH. Therefore, a 3% citric acid formula at pH 4.5 behaves very differently from a 3% formula at pH 2.5.

Reference: https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/citric032012FR.pdf

The real driver of irritation: pH × concentration

Many consumer-facing articles label citric acid as “gentle.” However, irritation potential depends on the proportion of free (undissociated) acid present. As pH decreases below its pKa values (~3.1, 4.7, 6.4), the fraction of protonated acid increases. Consequently, skin exposure to free acid rises.

Clinical irritation research demonstrates that both acid concentration and formulation pH determine irritation thresholds. Lower pH dramatically increases sting and barrier disruption, even at modest concentrations.

Reference: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9610857/

Therefore, formulators must treat citric acid as a controlled variable. A formula at pH 5.5 using 0.2% citric acid as a pH adjuster presents negligible exfoliating risk. In contrast, a leave-on serum at pH 3.0 with 5% citric acid behaves as a mild chemical exfoliant and requires safety evaluation accordingly.

Citric acid as a buffer system, not just an acid

Citric acid rarely acts alone in stable systems. Instead, formulators pair it with sodium citrate or potassium citrate to create a buffer. A buffer resists pH changes when external acids or bases enter the system. Consequently, buffered formulas maintain stability during storage and use.

Citric acid has three dissociation constants, which makes it versatile across a pH range of roughly 3 to 6. Therefore, citrate buffers often stabilize preservative systems that require specific pH windows.

Without buffering, pH drift can occur due to:

  • Preservative degradation
  • CO₂ absorption from air
  • Raw material variability
  • Container interactions

In practice, many preservative failures result from pH drift rather than antimicrobial weakness. Therefore, correct buffer design directly supports microbiological stability.

Citric acid and preservative performance

Citric acid does not function as a primary preservative. However, it significantly influences preservative performance in two ways:

1. Maintaining optimal pH for weak-acid preservatives

Preservatives such as benzoic acid and sorbic acid function best in their undissociated form, which predominates at lower pH. Therefore, citric acid supports these systems by maintaining an acidic environment that increases antimicrobial efficacy.

2. Chelation of trace metals

Trace metal ions such as iron and copper catalyze oxidation reactions. These reactions degrade fragrances, colorants, and antioxidants. Citric acid can bind these metal ions weakly, reducing catalytic activity. Although it is not as strong as EDTA or GLDA, it provides moderate chelation in clean-label systems.

Reference (chelating agents overview): https://www.thecosmeticformulator.com/post/what-is-a-chelating-agent-and-why-is-it-used-in-cosmetic-formulation

When citric acid chelation is not enough

Citric acid forms relatively weak complexes with divalent metal ions. Therefore, in high-risk systems—such as vitamin C serums, botanical extracts rich in polyphenols, or formulas exposed to light—stronger chelators may be required.

Formulators often combine citric acid buffering with EDTA, GLDA, or phytic acid for stronger metal control. Consequently, citric acid becomes part of a multi-layer stability strategy rather than a standalone solution.

Citric acid in exfoliating systems

At sufficiently low pH and concentration, citric acid acts as a mild alpha hydroxy acid. However, it differs from glycolic acid in molecular size and penetration behavior. Therefore, its exfoliating performance tends to be milder at equivalent concentrations.

Nevertheless, at pH values below 3.5, leave-on formulas require irritation testing and stability verification. In addition, regulators may evaluate low-pH leave-on products more closely.

The sodium benzoate + citric acid benzene myth

Online discussions frequently claim that citric acid combined with sodium benzoate forms benzene. In reality, benzene formation requires specific conditions including heat, UV exposure, metal catalysts, and ascorbic acid presence. Cosmetic emulsions stored at room temperature under normal use do not provide these conditions.

Moreover, controlled studies examining beverage systems show that benzene formation depends on multiple stress factors not typical of cosmetic storage. Therefore, routine cosmetic formulations using benzoate systems at proper pH do not spontaneously generate benzene under standard conditions.

Citric acid in solid and anhydrous systems

In anhydrous formats such as bath bombs and powders, citric acid remains inert until water exposure. However, humidity control becomes critical. Premature moisture uptake triggers effervescence when combined with carbonates.

Therefore, formulators must control particle size, humidity during production, and packaging moisture barrier properties.

Regulatory and labeling considerations

Citric acid appears on INCI lists as “Citric Acid.” Its salts appear as “Sodium Citrate” or “Potassium Citrate.” While it generally carries low regulatory restriction, low-pH leave-on systems may trigger product safety review depending on region.

Reference (EU SCCP opinion on citric acid systems including silver citrate): https://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_o_165.pdf

Formulation guidelines for best practice

  • Always measure final pH after 24 hours equilibration.
  • Use buffer systems rather than single acid adjustments.
  • Evaluate irritation risk when pH falls below 4.0 in leave-on products.
  • Combine with stronger chelators in oxidation-prone systems.
  • Monitor pH stability during accelerated stability testing.

Conclusion

Citric acid plays a far more complex role in cosmetic systems than most glossaries suggest. It regulates pH, supports preservative efficacy, contributes weak chelation, and influences irritation potential through its dissociation behavior. Consequently, formulators must treat it as a functional system component rather than a neutral background ingredient. When used correctly within buffered, stability-tested systems, citric acid remains one of the most versatile and safe acids available to cosmetic chemistry.

Research References

Photorealistic glass bubble containing plant-based PDRN structures surrounded by fresh Centella asiatica leaves with water droplets.

Centella PDRN

Centella PDRN is a skincare vegan product formulated with key ingredients including The Centella asiatica used is specifically young plants cultivated with a patented smart farm technology, ensuring quality and

learn more
Phycocyanin Powder – Natural Blue Pigment Antioxidant from Spirulina

PHYCOCYANIN POWDER

C-Phycocyanin pigment comes from the microalga Spirulina and delivers a vivid blue color with strong antioxidant activity. Producers offer it as a stable freeze-dried powder in purity grades E16, E18,

learn more

Explore More Insights in Beauty Science